Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (33550)	8/16/2021 5:50:07 PM
From: Sun Tzu	3 Recommendations Recommended By ajtj99 Jacob Snyder towerdog Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97597

Part 3 of the articles. One fun bit, I got to actually understand the history and the reasons for Cesar crossing the Rubicon. I never knew the full story. So in short, Cesar had an "interesting" life getting both extra privileges not afforded to anyone else and extra persecutions and pressures not done to most. The last bit was this, Cesar had executive immunity, but his term of office was in the north was coming to an end. His best way out was to be elected as the Consul. His enemies passed a law barring remote campaigning. So if he wanted to be elected, then he'd have to be in Rome in person. BUT, entering Italy proper with an army was a capital crime. So to do it legally, Cesar would have to resign his commission as a general. And when/if he were to do that, then he would no longer have executive immunity and he'd been vulnerable to being prosecuted. It was heads we win, tails you lose kind of situation for him. In the end, he decided to cross the river Rubicon with his army and take control of Rome. The author compares this with the events of this past January in DC. Whether you agree with him or not, the thread of the articles and especially some of the comments make for an interesting read. ===== Will the U.S. Pass a Point of No Return? 3 days ago — Over to Eric Schnurer: Crossing the Rubicon: If the United States, in recent years, has been tracking the decline and fall of Republican Rome, ...

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (33550)	8/16/2021 8:43:06 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	5 Recommendations Recommended By ajtj99 edward miller isopatch Lee Lichterman III towerdog Respond to of 97597

OT: < latter stages of the Roman Republic> In the transition from Republic to Empire, for several generations the Romans observed the outward formalities of the Republic, while the actual exercise of power became steadily more autocratic. Only when the process was complete, did they formally become an Empire. In the U. S., I see the same process. Power flows from individuals to government, from States to Federal. The legislature does not function, so the President rules by decree (executive orders). The President is above the law, and cannot be indicted or even investigated while in office. Another similarity: In the Roman Republic, every man was a part-time soldier. The electorate and the army were the same people. In the Empire, the army was professional mercenaries, often foreigners, who had little in common with the citizenry. ‘Private Security Contractor” is the modern euphemism for mercenary. We used a lot of them in Iraq and Afghanistan.