Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (44202)	11/20/2021 11:12:50 PM
From: ajtj99	1 Recommendation Recommended By LoveAG Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 96541

The brain does not fully develop until age 25. I wish the courts would recognize this. I also think the military should as well. You should not be able to join until you are 25, as your brain is not fully developed.

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (44202)	11/20/2021 11:16:49 PM
From: roto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 96541

<<"But the political climate being what it is, the prosecution could not possibly bring in the proper charges. Which is to say that the whole trial was a sham because they were pushing a political agenda rather than caring for justice and fairness.">> Politics be damned if that over rides the rule of law. The prosecution is THE problem then, if what you infer, is a political agenda. I still think the courts are somewhat lenient in the prosecution of high profile cases. It will be interesting the trial of Ahmaud Arbery's murder, beginning to see if that judge disallows the words "murder", "victim", whatnot. In reality, that should be a slam- dunk murder conviction. This shit seems to have gone ballistic since George Zimmerman got off with the Florida legal argument "Stand Your Ground" (amazing a guy with a handgun runs down his innocent victim, kills him, and escapes justice on that?) So, with the supreme court, once again, to rule on gun rights Supreme Court Appears To Lean Toward Expanding Gun Rights time.com "In what may be a troubling sign for the gun-safety movement nationwide, the majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court seemed inclined Wednesday to strike down a contested concealed-carry law, which could make it easier for millions of people to carry firearms in public." (key the url for the full article) Actually, that Supreme Court decision holds forth, then it should be entitled "Civilisation Lost" I'm thinking the Supreme Court, the 'law is not blind" is bull shit with so- called "activist conservatism" (I took exception to William Rehnquist's court pre- empting Florida voter rights in 2020).

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (44202)	11/21/2021 8:55:35 AM
From: Real Man	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 96541

I think the circumstances were that he was chased with weapons and a shot was fired, then he turned around and the guys that were murdered by him were pointing guns at him. Only then he drew his weapon and shot. 2-nd amendment guys. I am not familiar with this case, just read it briefly. You want people getting acquitted for self defense. When threatened with a gun, using a gun to kill is justified use of deadly force under the second Amendment. Who used the gun first is a crucial fact of the case. Way too many people go to prison for life or face death penalty for self defense, pretty much guaranteed that if you shoot someone in self defense in any state other than Texas you go to prison for life or worse. Even during a home invasion. Lots of cases when this happened, yet gun enthusiasts falsely believe they have the right to use the gun in self defense. Resume: always read the fine print, I didn’t -g- You do have the right in USA to shoot a guy pointing a loaded gun at you, unless that guy wears a police uniform. Then it’s aggravated cop murder -ggg-