SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Art of Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (3511)2/2/2022 8:42:11 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10695
 
Zero is not a lower bound.

See Japan and Germany for examples.

Also, recessions come after the Fed goes too far when they "know nothing" and tighten when they should be cutting. I thought I posted a chart of Fed Funds rate vs. the market on my thread somewhere....

Until the "they know nothing" point.... it showed markets going higher



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (3511)2/3/2022 9:55:18 PM
From: Sun Tzu3 Recommendations

Recommended By
ajtj99
Jacob Snyder
kidl

  Respond to of 10695
 
Here's a graph of US interest rate payments as a percentage of tax revenue. The final point on the graph is ~15%.
Note that the end point of the graph is 2020 where there interest rates were abnormally low.
Also note that the payments in 2020 were about the same as in 1982.

I checked the data, and we now have 30x more debt than we did in 1982. If the interest rates rise to just *below* the inflation rate i.e. triple, then the government will have to pay nearly half of its revenue in interest payments!! That is not going to happen. To be fair, the taxes were also below normal in 2020, so my math is a bit off. But the point remains because even 1/3 or 1/4 of revenue going to interest payments will be problematic.

My guess is that eventually the US will impose capital controls as it has done every time it was in a tight bind. You've been warned.

PS The situation for corporate and personal debt is better, but not by much.

PPS The source is here: data.worldbank.org