Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skinowski who wrote (756762)	2/6/2022 8:19:26 PM
From: didjuneau	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maple MAGA Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793668

Looks like Brandon has driven Russia closer to China - somewhere they'd probably rather not be. War Room clip discusses it here: rumble.com One party rule anywhere is not good. Our UniParty has been exposed as run by elite puppeteers, so if we clean out the corruption in the elections, we've got plenty of hard evidence to start cleaning out the corruption in our bureaucracies. There is a mandate that we support - the Constitution and the values it was based upon. Seems like even Putin agrees. Clipped from Valdai Club article posted earlier: Nationalism vs Cosmopolitanism Edit: Neeka found a good one here: Message 33543055 LindyBill was clued into this Valdai Club also: siliconinvestor.com Valdai means "holding" in Lithuanian. Holding the line on going batshit Woke?

To: skinowski who wrote (756762)	2/6/2022 10:44:01 PM
From: Thehammer	7 Recommendations Recommended By didjuneau DinoNavarre DMaA fred woodall isopatch and 2 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793668

My contention that the the USA form of government is impossible to compete with if it is properly executed. That is because it unleashes the true power of free enterprise. It is simple in form but extremely difficult to implement because it goes against human nature. China achieved its current status by embracing a form of capitalism but they are retrenching on that because it ultimately loosens the CCP's grip on power and once a quasi-enslaved society achieves a level of freedom, they become rebellious. China also tried to get treated as a developing country while enjoying being an economic superpower, They stole patents, forced companies to turn over trade secrets in order to sell into china and manipulated markets and their currency. China has been paying for influence all over the world - Italy, Africa, South America, as well as developed countries. They have "invested" all over the USA in small towns, pig farms and meat packing plants. I am not near as sanguine about China as your post reflects. They have and still murder their own citizens ( we may be doing the same). A free society is an existential threat to their planned dominance. They know it and I believe also interfered with our elections. I also differentiate the Chinese people from the CCP. I don't know Spengler but he sounds like he is on the take as well :)