Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (13131)	2/20/2022 1:58:56 PM
From: wilywilly	1 Recommendation Recommended By Clam digger Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26680

Here is a bit of a long read that examines the plethora of disinformation on Ivermectin and other false claims: ‘You will not believe what I've just found.’ Inside the ivermectin saga: a hacked password, mysterious websites and faulty data. - MarketWatch

To: Kirk © who wrote (13131)	2/20/2022 9:03:49 PM
From: jpdunwell	1 Recommendation Recommended By h_ Respond to of 26680

From a FOX station here in the Bay Area Hmmm, does that mean it's just right of extreme left? LOL Seriously, here's a little different perspective on that "study": theepochtimes.com Whatever your perspective, I think it's clear there's extreme publication bias occurring these days, and many authors have noted that if you try to publish anything scientific that goes against the accepted mainstream views, that you just can't get published. We're not talking about a fair peer-review process here, which is healthy and needed. If that were the case, the authors wouldn't have a problem getting answers for why their publications were pulled/refused, but that's not what's been happening. Take a look at this article, and among the other revelations, which are really nothing new to anyone who's been keeping themselves informed, it's pretty easy to miss the fact that even a Clinical Director at the NIH can't even get published when he attempts to submit data that's damaging to the pro-vaccine agenda. theepochtimes.com It's also not surprising that the CDC and FDA have come out against Ivermectin and other therapeutics that don't bring them any money. This FDA official explains their vested interest quite well in this Project Veritas expose: projectveritas.com So why should anyone believe what the CDC or FDA say anymore? And apparently, the majority no longer do, as the % of Americans who feel that way has dropped from 69% to 44% since the pandemic started, according to NBC news poll (see p. 17 of link below). I'd say that's more than well-deserved, and should be even lower in my opinion. s3.documentcloud.org

To: Kirk © who wrote (13131)	2/21/2022 7:59:22 AM
From: w0z	3 Recommendations Recommended By h_ POKERSAM Winfastorlose Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26680

Always consider the sources. I have some personal experience with Ivermectin treatments. 1. My wife's doctor had a 103 fever, difficulty breathing such that he was on self-prescribed oxygen, and was experiencing chest pain. After giving him my tube of Bimectin ("horse dewormer" for those who like to denigrate) and the FLCCC info on early treatment, he was much better after 48 hours. He actually credits me with saving his life and at last count has now treated over 120 patients at home with IVM, only one hospitalization and zero deaths. 2. My 15 year old grandson had early covid symptoms and tested positive. Fortunately I had previously sent my daughter an emergency supply (20 each 12 mg IVM tablets) just a week earlier to have on hand "just in case". She immediately (very important) gave him the FLCCC recommended treatment and his headache cleared after 24 hours. All symptoms were gone after the full 5-day protocol. I take personal offense at the FDA's snide comment, obviously directed at Southern people "You are not a horse. You are not a cow, Seriously, y’all. Stop it," This reminds me of a consultant giving some BS HR course at my division of HP (where I was the GM). Describing someone he was denigrating, the words "rural south, highly uneducated" rolled off his tongue automatically. I raised my hand and told him I was rural south, had a BSEE from MIT and MBA from Harvard, and did not appreciate his comment. The FDA has approved vaccines that are not fully tested, and what results there are likely contaminated by prejudice and financial corruption. They are in no way to be trusted (ditto NIH and CDC) and the public is now becoming aware of that.