SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Sphar who wrote (7503)2/18/1998 2:03:00 AM
From: Lady Lurksalot  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
Mke,

Brava!!! Excellent post!!!

Re the Japanese: Did we not have them sign an agreement following WWII that they would never again engage in battle outside of their own country? Was this rescinded following the Gulf War? I am hazy on this point and can't seem to locate the proper referenec.

Holly



To: Michael Sphar who wrote (7503)2/18/1998 7:50:00 AM
From: Jack Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Michael,

You are right. President Clinton avoided the war he thought was not righteous, but now he wants to send my sons to fight for a war against a country who is not threatening us. The last time I looked over at the Gulf of Mexico or Tampa Bay (where I live), I did not see any Iraqi warships loaded with invasion troops. Nor have I detected any missiles incoming to my home country from Iraq.

Now I have no love or admiration for Saddam Hussein, but, just to explore the other side of the coin, what gives the US the right to determine just which countries are responsible enough to produce and keep weapons of mass destruction? I am told that such weapons are in the possession of Russia, England, France, Israel, Pakistan, India, etc. Are we going to war with any of them?

And let us not forget that many wars are started for political cover and non-altruistic reasons. Could Monica Lewinski become "the face that launched a thousand ships?"<g>

Just some alternative thoughts.

Jack



To: Michael Sphar who wrote (7503)2/18/1998 9:06:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 20981
 
Michael,

I bookmarked this post for further discussion when the market is not open and I have time. Good post and point.

Glenn



To: Michael Sphar who wrote (7503)2/18/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
Two former heads of the CIA agree with you.

That's an unprecedented vote of no confidence.



To: Michael Sphar who wrote (7503)2/19/1998 7:53:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Michael J. Sphar, Major, USAFR, Ret.

Michael,

I have not made a reply of merit as you know. I will try this weekend.

I am curious as to what the acronym USAFR means. I know the USAF but what does the R mean?