Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1461290)

6/7/2024 8:33:09 AM

From: Maple MAGA

2 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
Mick Mørmøny

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682

You boast God spoke nine words to you then you chicken out of explaining what He said.

To: Jamey who wrote ( 24400)

From: Brumar89

You're right, God once truly spoke to me very briefly (audibly) in response to prayer. Though, the prayer had taken place over a period of several months before and when I heard God's voice I wasn't praying or even thinking about God. But I won't be dogmatic and say that this happens often as I have no idea if it does. I don't hear people talk about this (except for obvious fakers like Pat Robertson and Jimmy Swaggart) so it may be kind of rare. Is your statement above based on personal experience, that is, has God spoken to you? And I mean really spoken. I'm talking about hearing, not feeling something within.

To: Jamey who wrote ( 24405)
From: Brumar89

Santiago, re. your comment about God not audibly speaking for 2000 years, guess you should tell God about that. About prophecy or spiritual powers, if anyone tells you they are a prophet or have any spiritual powers, you should almost automatically not believe them. All I know is I heard nine words. I can't be the only one who has.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1461290)	6/7/2024 5:03:53 PM
From: pocotrader	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Doren rdkflorida2 Respond to of 1573682

Donnie has never read the bible, someone told him about that quote

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1461290)	6/7/2024 6:19:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brumar89 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573682

Brumar, You say "an eye for an eye" was only to protect Jews but then you chicken out of explaining that. To be sure, I think Joachim was talking about "turn the other cheek," not "eye for an eye." Doesn't matter, though. Joachim is a heretic who contradicts himself all the time. He claims "eye for an eye" is a Christian concept but can't back it up with New Testament scripture. He openly declares that he doesn't follow the Old Testament, even though every single Christian denomination in the world has declared both the Old and the New Testaments to be canon. And now he comes up with a lame excuse for not following one of Jesus' most powerful, unique, and identifiable commands, namely "turn the other cheek." It is one of the most well-known commands from Jesus' Sermon on the Mount. It was revolutionary at the time, and still is even 2000 years later. To reject it is to basically reject Jesus himself. Tenchusatsu