Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: halfscot who wrote (8089)	2/22/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: Darth Trader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

<<<I think it is still the .45>> Now it is the Berretta 9mm

To: halfscot who wrote (8089)	2/22/1998 4:22:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

This also begs the question: why not an autopsy? Generally speaking, when someone dies in a plane crash in horrible weather, from which there are no survivors, the cause of death is assumed to be, uh.....obvious. This makes sense to me, but then I'm not really into conspiracy stuff.

To: halfscot who wrote (8089)	2/22/1998 5:44:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

<<He was using a 357 magnum, a much higher velocity bullet than a standard .45, at very close range and there was no exit of the bullet in that case.>> Yes I remember that picture, I don't think the frame was massive enough to be a .357, maybe a .38. It doesn't matter because in that picture the guy's head is bulging with the bullet about blow the far side of his head away. My friend's son had a .45. Some friends showed up with some beer and he started playing with his gun. To show how safe it was with the clip out he stuck it in his mouth, cocked the hammer and pulled the trigger forgetting the round he had chambered earlier. Not only did the back of his head hit the wall but most of his brains. Even though they were not in the bullets path, the pressure blew his eyes out.