Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ajtj99 who wrote (40797)	4/2/2025 11:43:42 PM
From: kckip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41435

Thank you for the summary ajtj99! You're POV is always one I respect! I'm willing to wait to see what actually happens, but I find it hard to believe that USA footing the bill for the world has to be the standard. PDJT 1.0 policy certainly didn't have that outcome.

To: ajtj99 who wrote (40797)	4/3/2025 7:58:06 AM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 41435

In 1910, 40% of Americans worked on farms. 70-years later, 2% of Americans worked on farms. Nobody thought those jobs were coming back. They were lost due to increases in productivity. Why people think this doesn't apply to manufacturing jobs is mind-boggling. China is installing as many industrial robots as the rest of the world combined. They do it in order to increase productivity. They’re also outsourcing lower paying work to countries with lower labor costs. How can we possibly bring those jobs back - and hope to remain competitive while paying American labor costs? I thought for years that we need to automate. That would instantly make our costs competitive with the Chinese. If we can’t be competitive - having more overpriced jobs won’t do any good.