Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trumptown who wrote (217147)	10/5/2025 8:15:08 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Recommended By Trumptown Respond to of 219085

All very well thought through, logical sequence of events, great post!!! Excellent common sense!!! Thank you!!! GZ

To: Trumptown who wrote (217147)	10/5/2025 8:36:07 PM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By h_ Respond to of 219085

Check out website www.ae911truth.org. They go through the govt report bit by bit and using engineering principles and physics blow holes in the report. Its up to you to read it. If you read it and still think the planes took down the buildings well I dont know what to say. I'll leave it there

To: Trumptown who wrote (217147)	10/5/2025 8:43:36 PM
From: golfer72	1 Recommendation Recommended By h_ Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219085

Why would the planes have to hit the the exact floor where the explosives were? The Towers didnt come crashing down right away. Did you see bldg 7? No plane hit it. It came down after the twin towers did. In the same manner. Falling into its own footprint. Hmmm.. There were infrared scans taken of the rubble and temps were reached that never could have been without explosives. etc etc etc. Many eye witnesses to the explosions. The planes were the cover story. I dont know who planned it but it was well coordinated and not just some cave dwellers with box cutters.

To: Trumptown who wrote (217147)	10/6/2025 11:15:02 AM
From: h_	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 219085

Jet fuel is not explosive; it's essentially kerosene and needs to be finely atomized to combust. The mostly black smoke is evidence that the temperatures were far too low and insufficient to even weaken the steel, which included 47 box columns comprising the central spine of the towers. The energy required for the observed destruction isn't there by at least an order of magnitude. Portions of the building ejected sideways (and even upward) more than a building width at the top at the beginning. The "pancake" collapse theory is ridiculous because it couldn't possibly have occurred in the short time available (almost as quickly as the acceleration of gravity would allow) since the stories got progressively stronger as the floor number decreased. The government, or rather those directing it, needed the public on board for acceptance of war in the Middle East.