SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: George Coyne who wrote (8388)2/25/1998 6:52:00 PM
From: jhild  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
George, you are missing my point here. The leaks that are being investigated are the unflattering stories of prosecutorial excesses on the part of two of Starr's assistants, in their past work. We're not talking about leaking grand jury testimony, or at least I'm not. Starr hasn't made that claim in any event. He doesn't like the fact that these stories about his staff are being publicized. He thinks that unflattering stories are an obstruction of justice, even if true. Surprisingly there are many here that think the same way. I find that fascinating.



To: George Coyne who wrote (8388)2/25/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 20981
 
If you can't see a possible nexus (obstruction of justice) between remarks critical of Starr for leaks and the creation of those leaks by the WH, then you are myopic.

As jhild rightly notes, this is NOT what Starr is going on about. Please read today's press.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News