SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1578765)12/21/2025 2:19:00 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579790
 
There's nothing "suboptimal" about pairing an ICE with an electric motor and a battery so that you can scale back on the size and HP requirements of the ICE.

Trains have been doing that for more than a century. Because it is more efficient than using the ICE directly. IC engines have their peak efficiency in a fairly narrow RPM band. Hybrids take advantage of that. Especially the ones more like the Chevy Volt than the Prius. Not to mention, regenerative braking is a huge win as it is with a BEV.

As you note, there is nothing suboptimal about a hybrid. In fact, if you want an ICE, it is the optimal solution.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1578765)12/21/2025 2:54:12 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 1579790
 
T

I've never had "range anxiety".

And I've driven across the U.S a couple times in my Model S.

Thousands and thousands of miles.

tesla.com

E



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1578765)12/21/2025 3:10:13 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Respond to of 1579790
 
I have an aversion to unnecessary duplication of parts in mechanical systems. Given a choice I'll choose fewer moving parts over more moving parts if reliability is a consideration.