Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Qone0 who wrote (41577)	1/29/2026 4:19:38 PM
From: Jack of All Trades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41632

Well it depends on how well the signature match goes. When the machines are adjusted so that they will accept pretty much any signature then it all goes out the window. What was Utah's rejection rate compared to other elections and compared to the national average? They should always be similar. I think it was either Michigan or PA that signature match rates were almost 100% which is impossible. Or the non matches get dumped into a adjudication image, and then the operators can "bulk" adjudicate with out review. Why do you think they didn't want Tina Peters to image the voting machines and tabulators prior to re-imaging them? If there was nothing to hide then a image to capture the state of the machines at the end of the election should see fine.