Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (8679)	2/27/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Sounds good Janice! Until you realize that some of the tapes were made by the FBI!

To: Janice Shell who wrote (8679)	2/27/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

But the Watergate tapes were in several ways a very different proposition. First, they were made with the knowledge of the participants. That doesn't undermine the fact that they exist. Regardless of the laws in Maryland or Virginia, other states believe that it's okay to recall by tape someone's words, like that slick salesman that promises you the moon over the phone, then delivers garbage. listened to, perhaps copied and passed on to Lucianne Goldburg; then given--in a complete version?--to Newsweek, and also to Starr. I don't understand what difference it makes who has listened to them. Does it make the words less true, the more times the tapes are played. So. Not the same thing at all. Huh? Words on tape are words on tape. If they can be authenticated by means of voice-print technology or some such, then they are completely of the same veracity of the Nixon tapes, IMO.