Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DD™ who wrote (8777)	2/28/1998 3:54:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

DD, re What we are seeing here is a double-standard the likes of which may be strong enough to keep the Slickster in office for the duration. Citizens concerned with high office corruption presently seem to be relegated to the status of ineffectual observers. We have to believe that Justice is operating; that the founding fathers gave us the best system possible in an imperfect world. But from a personal viewpoint: If "things" continue at the present pace, (ie more scandals) one might wonder if more Dems might begin to at least voice "some" concern over what may be left of their party by the year 2001. Just a thought. Sometimes I think it would be better if the IC was a staunch Democrat. With Starr a Republican, the Dems can successfully avoid any responsibility towards taking responsibility for high office corruption. I have to believe that if Starr were a Democrat, there would be significantly fewer games being played by the WH.