Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (10317)	3/11/1998 10:06:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Actually, what you emphasized does nothing to further the notion that what the troopers said was false, and Brock in fact admits that twice in the article. Nothing you have said or cited refutes that central issue. Maybe he fears a libel suit if he did accuse them of making it all up? Just think of the things that might come out of that - I'll bet the Clintonista WH told him not to make that challenge, all those new subpoenas and witnesses. He says he now questions their "credibility" - so what? The article makes clear that it is now Brock that has the credibility problems, along with his new patrons. >>Personally, though, I still find it hard to believe these stories--with all of the effort and money that has gone into discovering Clinton's pecadillos, why haven't they dug up (to take just one example) at least one hotel clerk who will corroborate these tales? The troopers are the corroboration, sorry you missed the obvious.