Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (8896)	3/25/1998 1:33:00 AM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

Parkfield is being called a bust. The patterns once seen are now questioned as statistically inconclusive. Don't hold your breath for Hayward either. Two major shakes in 80 years, big deal.

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (8896)	3/25/1998 1:40:00 AM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

Your turn, Holly. Oops! Sorry.

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (8896)	3/25/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

Parkfield is more overdue than that copy of Charlotte's Web I still have from elementary school. I think the school's been razed, so am I off the hook? Anyway, maybe Parkfield is "saving itself" for a Big'un, and Loma Prieta was just a local accommodation, an equalization of tectonic energy across a broader front... The Cascadia Subduction Zone has me entranced. Sure, a mag-eight shaker in our lovely Northland would be a news item. But imagine one of those nine-and-some knucklecrackers just offshore from Oregon/Washington. The hundred-meter tsunami marching into Puget Sound would make groovy video. And I don't know the elevation of Redmond, but AAPL just might become a "buy" again.