Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (6281)	3/28/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: Grantcw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

Eddy, With due respect to your opinion I disagree with you 100% with above. In fact if I would not be a persistent salesman I would put you on my " forget about him " list. Please do "forget about me". I'm not going to get into one of the many verbal fights on the Osicom boards. Life's too short. Go Osicom! Grant

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (6281)	3/28/1998 6:20:00 PM
From: CMS27	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Eddy, I have to disagree. I also support Par and Osicom but it is the CTO Leonard Hecht who is spearheading the network convergence vision. Perhaps Par came up with it, but it is Leonard Hecht that has been charged with the repsonsibility to make it happen. >>A pleasing passive architecture of a electronic product is the very least one would expect in 1998.<< I think you should research the term passive architecture and see what it means in this case. It is a technical term. There would be no reason for anyone's feeling to be hurt by it being called passive, because that is what it was intended to be! I can't remember exactly what the terms means, but I think it means that each channel is independent, so if one hangs the others continue to operate, not sure but it's something like that. >>When is this nonsense ever going to stop when dominant market forces in a competitive sector are allowed to advertise what they have not got-yet? Bragging about leadership without end LUCENT is just another one banking on its name and the money behind it, while catching up an other companies vision and foresights.<< You fancy yourself a salesman but you make the above statement with apparent astonishment. Why wouldn't Lucent leverage it's name and play catchup in areas where others have proven you can turn a buck. I don't think this is anything that hasn't been done a million times before, as a salesman you should be very familiar with this, but you seem surprised by it, something doesn't add up. >>I will post only one more message.The last torpedo to hit the wicked ship of slanderous greed. It may not sink it but sure it will cause some SHORTERS to jump overboard in a flash.<< Fire when ready. Scott p.s. remember I'm long, ok Eddy?

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (6281)	3/28/1998 6:23:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

<< In fact if I would not be a persistent salesman I would put you on my " forget about him " list. But in view that you are still are a sales prospect together with the "lurkers" who may have similar opinions as you, I am trying again. >> That paragraph says it all, Eddy. How much are you getting paid for your sales pitch? << Mr. Parvinder Chada is THE MAN in charge of OSICOM from A-Z. >> Too bad. << Every single acquisition served only one purpose and the purpose was to advance Mr.Chadas grand design of... >> Oh really. Too bad those acquisistions have done nothing for shareholders and everything for Par and company. He has benefitted but how have shareholders benefitted? << Mr. Parvinder Chada is not perfect in every aspect. But then who is in this crazy world? >> That's for sure. << But he is a brilliant pilot in the digital revolutionary process. His vision needs support and he deserves a round of applause to bring his vision forward to this point for starters. >> Can you provide an example of where he has done this in the past? Or are you refering to things he is supposedly going to do.