Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Alternative Fuel Systems ATF:VSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (673)	4/5/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: Ally	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4605

Hey Mark, stayed all night to watch the thread? After my having another nice evening and a wonderful night, came down to pick up my e-mail, and what do I see, numero more postings from Mr. BULL MARK, guarding the fortress against people who may dare to pose contrarian views on this thread: >>Syfon, If your understanding of ATF is that they are just "another NG converter" - than frankly _you have not done your homework either. I am all for contrarian view - but they must be well supported - not just spurious blithering.<< What exactly is the your problem here Mark? I understand all of Syfon's points. Let me say it for you again: 1. ATF _is_ just another NG converter. 2. The technology is not a big deal. He has seen many NG trucks and cars in Europe and New Zealand. 3. Conversion kits may not be that vital or in demand. 4. It's going to be a bumpy road ahead for AFT. 5. He cautions new investors. The stock is over valued. What homework do you want him to do before he is qualified to express his views? Why do you assume that he hasn't read the postings on this thread? Why can't he expess his opinions? If there are any unsupported and spurious arguments on this thread, anyone checking past postings will easily see that its yours. >>As far as the valuation of the stock goes ... if we were to be constrained by Denise's sentiments, the DOW should be at about 3500<< Oh, no...this is OK, it not spurious blithering. Mark, Mark, Mark.. I'm sure you've done all the analysis and the numbers to show how my sentiments come up to a Dow 3500. Hey man, you forgot your pill again! THIS IS AN OPEN FORUM OF CYBER INVESTORS...it's not Mark's fortress. But then, you're THE MAN and "i'm just a gal." stay tuned.... d