Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Alternative Fuel Systems ATF:VSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Praxis who wrote (675)	4/4/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Brad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4605

To all: This harping on about who are brokers and who are shorting and who have ulterior motives is ANNOYING! Let's just use SI to spread info on stocks -- we're all intelligent enough to make the actual purchase decision on our own! This stuff just clutters up the thread. And BTW, it happens on a lot of these threads once a long-anticipated stock price rise finally happens (see Pyng for an example). Anyway,.....To Bonnie: So, what are your thoughts as to where the company goes from here? There was talk earlier about being close to other contracts -- how realistic is that? Your comments, please, since you seem to be the most open and one of the most knowledgeable about this stock. And thanks for all your time on this thread. Brad

To: Praxis who wrote (675)	4/4/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Veritas	Respond to of 4605

Apologies for my misuse of a Jewish expression. I meant it in the sense of "dupes" but now realize there is a more literal interpretation. Sorry. Anyway, my intent was to express my annoyance at the incessant over-analysing and quibbling going on. Good luck.

To: Praxis who wrote (675)	4/5/1998 9:05:00 AM
From: Mark Bartlett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4605

Praxis, <<I shouldn't think anyone should ridicule anyone else because they no longer feel comfortable.I shouldn't think anyone should ridicule anyone else because they no longer feel comfortable.>> <<I think all would benefit if they just talked relevant issues and not whether someone is shorting ...... >> I agree ... with one caveat ... that honest, verified information is posted. As far as I am concerned, whether someone is long or short a stock is of no relevance to me ... but if they attempt to inject half-truth ot outright misinformation, for the purpose of reinforcing their particular position, then I will hold then accountable. Opinions are fine - but not opinion being portrayed as fact ... that's dishonesty. Now ... back to ATF discussions ... I hope <g> MB