To: David Miller who wrote (9768 ) 4/5/1998 8:29:00 PM From: TChai Respond to of 10836
But I don't think they place any emphasis on a particular share price. David, My apology if I was unclear about this point. The price target of 12 had more to do with psychological and the perception of the stock market than anything else. It just happens to be the high made last Nov 18. You're correct that customers don't sit around and wait for Borl to hit a certain price target before placing orders.Why would they not be more impressed still by the performance of, say, BEA? Last time I looked this was a late-20s stock with a market cap closing in on $2bn. I think that they do. BEA came in with 100% revenues increase in their latest quarter year-to-year. They've landed big contract with big customer like Boeing and continue to lead in this segment. And the stock market is saying that this is the company that will dominate this market by giving it big market cap. It's probably one of the reasons if not the reason that Roger Sippl and company decided to merge with Borl to have additional resources to fight this battle. Will they win the 1st place? My first guess is probably not, but you've got to try.In the cause-and-effect stakes, revenue is the cause, stock price the effect, not vice versa. Ultimately, it's the revenue. But if you have a good story to tell, sometimes the market gave you the benefit of the doubt, initially anyway. That's how all these IPO's and the private funding came about. We'll find out soon enough in the week of Apr 27. In addition to the revenues number, Mr. Yocam supposedly will tell the world a new story about Borl. The stock market will let us know if it's a good one.