Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (13589)	4/15/1998 10:37:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

>>Certainly if they have used the IRS to audit their "enemies"; that would also bother me a lot though it was Nixon who got that down to an artform--but that does NOT justify its use, if it was done). Wrong. Nixon was an amateur in that department compared with FDR, Kennedy and Johnson.

To: Sam who wrote (13589)	4/16/1998 9:13:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

There is probably some guidance from the framers of the Constitution in the Federalist papers and other contemporary writings of the framers as to what constitutes a "high crime and misdemeanor." I haven't ever researched the subject so I don't know what's been written. However, I would venture however that perjury, subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, invasion of privacy (Filegate), misuse of public offices (Travelgate), tax evasion (Whitewater), lying to Congress, etc., etc., etc. and other crimes of which Clinton stands accused would all qualify if sufficient evidence exists. JLA