Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (13698)	4/16/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: George Coyne	Respond to of 20981

<< Of course I can't prove it! I thought it was obvious that I was being facetious!>> Excellent parry!! Facetiously yours, G. W.

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (13698)	4/17/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

Ah! You were being facetious? In fact so was I. In fact I happen to agree with you in some respects about Ms. Jones. However, I think it is a little strange that when I or someone else who is not a Clinton supporter makes a reasonable inference from the circumstances (such as Clinton has lied, perjured himself, suborned perjury, obstructed justice, withheld evidence, had an enemies list, misused gov't offices, laundered money, etc. etc.) such inferences must be proved in a Court of law and result in judgment to be valid. Clinton supporters reasonable inferences however are entitled to total deference without the need for proof, etc. Very interesting disparity. Especially interesting is the fact that such inferences drawn by persons who don't support Clinton are obviously motivated by base instincts which are not worthy. JLA