SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Curlton Latts who wrote (16605)4/16/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: michael modeme  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
 
Curlton, Simply because Ken has only been on SI for a short period doesn't mean that he is uninformed, or that his argument is unsubstantiated nonsense. Although CYMI does have virtually all of the market share right now, it is still vulnerable to competition. Apple once had a very large market share. American car makers once had a very large market share. etc. I don't think Cymer is going down by any means, however we and Cymer should be keeping an eye on other companies, especially since the pot of gold is becoming increasingly large. Regards



To: Curlton Latts who wrote (16605)4/17/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: ken foxx  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 25960
 
Carlton Lutts or Latts or whoever. I will comment on your moronic posts. You appear to be a creature of the SI poster boards. I would assume that you suck as an investor and as a tech analyst. It appears that you push some sort of 'Technical Analysis' crap, which instantly describes you as a loser.

My comments were genuine. Yours are inane, just silly. For investors who want to remain in business beyond the next business cycle, they need to realize that BS artists like you are very dangerous. You are one of those cocktail party analysts who live for the fame of your posts. I'm reminded of our favorite billionaire who says "If I'm so rich, why aren't I smart?"

Curly, you're neither. You're a loser.

Ken



To: Curlton Latts who wrote (16605)4/17/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: Rob-Chemist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
 
Curlton - I agree that CYMI presently has a lock on eximers used for lithography. However, COHR has apparently sold more than one of their eximers (even though they have only shipped one). In their last quarterly report, they reported that they had received orders of almost $5 million for lithography lasers. This is, of course, much less than the ca. $60 million of COHR.



To: Curlton Latts who wrote (16605)4/17/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25960
 
Gee, what started the sparks?. I too, have to remind myself that, I never have pissed people off with my opinions, but only the way I might speak them.
Good to see Curleys Cymer go from 14 to 25, since he started TO SUGGEST IT, at the beginning of the year.
I just wish that I still had my initial, 10k shares.