Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DScottD who wrote (14388)	4/22/1998 12:12:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 20981

Yes. Funny, isn't it, how people who change stories they've been telling for years suddenly become heroes--as long as they're dumping on Clinton. Bet that if Charles Manson came out with some juicy anti-Slick tale Zlot would petition for his pardon.

To: DScottD who wrote (14388)	4/22/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

1) There is no indication that Morris "has changed his story". Certainly when he worked for Clinton he didn't "go public" on those matters, but because he does so now that doesn't mean that he has "changed his story". 2) If you refer to moi then you exaggerate. Morris offers some insight but he sees everything through a political prism and he thinks Starr should drop the "Monica" stuff because the WH has been successful in getting the great unwashed to think that it's all about sex. I demur. I do not have such a low opinion of the American public and think that is a diversion anyway, that Starr's investigation should remain focused on the law wherever that leads. Public opinion will follow, it should not lead.