Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NYBellBoy who wrote (2263)	5/10/1998 7:38:00 PM
From: john michael winesette	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9096

nybellboy-is your assertion that bell is involved simply hearsay or can you publish information that can be independently verified?? i can tell you that if bell is involved, this little company could fly.....another poster asserted that the certification process for the aircraft had been ...completed?....folks, verification of the facts, e.g., a manufacturer is tooled up and ready to build multiple orders for arc craft,etc., is a no-brainer for driving "investor pleasure"...i'll do what i can to nail down these details-let's all publish what we can without hype-we may be on to something here......

To: NYBellBoy who wrote (2263)	5/10/1998 8:44:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9096

Bell boy, you of course may be right, but, I see no signs of actual contracts between PLFM and ADCT, ADCT according to Todd is simply doing a "business plan" for a fee. They have not committed any capital, they did not even sign, to the best of my knowledge a letter of intent to do anything with PLFM but the "for fee" consulting job. You must be careful when people say they talk with these and these companies, it is no justification for assuming something will come out of it. In the last 10 years I had "serious" discussions with the three big automotive companies, I had executed Non Disclosure agreements with some of the biggest Dow Jones Corporations, and even got one of the largest appliances manufacturers to pay a very substantial sum as a "Stand Still Fee" agreement, and I am not even trading over the BB (G). What I am trying to say is that look and see is cheap (it is even better when you get them to pay for "look and see"), let see one of these companies committing $10 MM for the deployment of one system and six months of its operations, then we may have a start. Zeev