Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jules B. Garfunkel who wrote (55605)	5/15/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: John Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Jules/ALL,re:"ML/tk". Please have sympathy on this guy. He may have a gun at his head by the NEW MAFIA or something of that nature. Basically, I believe he is UNDER GUN of some sort.

To: Jules B. Garfunkel who wrote (55605)	5/15/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: Larry Loeb	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jules, Intel's management must find a solution to this problem. Intel has to realize that the increased volatility in their stock price, caused by this analyst's comments, is not serving their investors, or themselves, well. I have no problem with curbing Kurlak (if that were possible, but I disagree with your comment that investors aren't being served well. Kurlak's comments only effect the stock in the short term. This is great for buyers, neutral for holders, and bad for sellers. As a holder, and occasional buyer, I can't get too upset. Of course I prefer the wealth effect of a higher stock price. :-) Larry

To: Jules B. Garfunkel who wrote (55605)	5/15/1998 2:10:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman	Respond to of 186894

Jules, Thanks for your analysis. While I disagree with Kurlak's opinions, I have found that these kurlakian moments are a good time to buy calls. They are almost always profitable - in the relatively short term. Barry