SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : From the Trading Desk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Craig Richards who wrote (3071)5/20/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: doniam  Respond to of 4969
 
Good post Craig...Thanks
-Don



To: Craig Richards who wrote (3071)5/21/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: Stoctrash  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4969
 
Craig ...did the BID get to 66?
I might have only gotten to 65 7/8-66 1/2 or similar...

Just because the ASK hit 66 1/2 don't mean
you should have been filled.

Good luck.

fred



To: Craig Richards who wrote (3071)5/21/1998 2:20:00 PM
From: ratan lal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4969
 
Craig

I have had similar problems E* trade, but didnt have the patience to follow thru like you
have.

My most recent, where we have traded 4 e-mails, has to do with a market order to sell
Pfizer that was trading at 115 5/8 and PUTS on Pfizer that were sold 2-minutes later.

They executed the Pfixer order at 115 1/8 about 3 minutes later. Their first excuse (in
writing) was that they had to buy back the put first so as to not leave a naked PUT
position (as you knwo a put does not protect the underlying stock).

Their second excuse was (the guy that wrote the first letter did not know what he was
saying) that the order was executed in 3-mins which was right for that stock on that
day . Unbelievable that an actively traded stock like PFE would have taken 3-mins.

I have asked for arbitration. They said that they would look at it in more detail. Havent
heard anything yet since May 12, 1998.

Your post has given me the encouragement to follow thru on my complaints.

Could you post (or e-mail) the name and tel# of the NASD attorney and the
address where you filed the complaint.

Thanks

Ratan



To: Craig Richards who wrote (3071)5/21/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: James F. Hopkins  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4969
 
Craig; You didn't touch on if they had the shares to lend you to
short, seems they got an out just by saying they didn't have
enough shares to lend you so they didn't work your order.
It's hard to beat these guys if your selling short, unless you
were selling short against the box.
Jim