SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trooper Technologies Inc. (TPP.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Pool who wrote (1236)5/22/1998 6:21:00 AM
From: JOHN SAMSEL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2090
 
Robert Pool,

Thank you for taking your time to let us all know your impressions of the hearing. I felt like I was there with all the descriptions of the setting, time line, and witness responses. I was surprised about how long this is taking. It seems that Judge Cohen wants to understand the technical side of this argument as well as the contractual. He must be fair.

What closing arguments were made pro and con about turning the new designs and drawings over to TPP? Is TTRIF still basing its refusal to turn over the plans on the assumption that TPP will not be able to build and get enough waste contract to make the business profitable and pass all the stringent Polish environmental requirements? If that was their argument, did TPP point out the failed Fort Devens and Skagit county attempts of TTRIF to build plants in the USA?

Thanks

John



To: Robert Pool who wrote (1236)5/22/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: Ed MacKenzie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2090
 
Hi Robert,

Thanks for the info. For a stock that is all over the place in the last 24 hours, it sure is awfully quite.

The TT guys are bragging that TPP lawyers didn't fair well yesterday, and that TT will win in the long run.

What are your feelings as far "how it went" rather that the play-by-play ?

Thanks for your input.

A concerned TPP shareholder
Ed MacKenzie