SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harry Landsiedel who wrote (26536)5/24/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: ed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
I bet there won't be any price war in the rest of 1998. If you go to the computer stores, you will see that none of those vendors offer any sub $1000 PCs, i.e CPQ, HWP, IBM ...etc, except Packard Bell , which offered some low end models under $1000. My impression is that the sub$1000 PCs was orginally created by CPQ to get rid of its inventory of old models, and now its cleaned, and no more sub$1000 PCs
anymore.



To: Harry Landsiedel who wrote (26536)5/24/1998 9:04:00 PM
From: Spots  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
>>Re: IBM and HP, look at their revenue/profit per
employee. Compared to cpq, it ain't good.

IBM and HP support large development efforts. They
both support operating systems and many software packages,
as well as proprietary hardware. Before
CPQ acquired Tandem and (by assumption) DEC, they had nothing
resembling these kinds of efforts to support. Now they do.
If they attempt to run DEC and Tandem like the prior CPQ,
they will have wasted their investment. I don't believe
CPQ will do that, but if so, look for serious long term
trouble.

That's not to say that DEC can't be improved upon. Just
that CPQ is not in the same ball game as before these
acquisitions and would be courting disaster to apply the
same business model. Those who analyze them based on
that model court serious misunderstanding of the dynamics
of the new CPQ. And believe me, it is a new company not
at all like it was before, whether CPQ likes it or not.
Anyway, they did it on purpose.



To: Harry Landsiedel who wrote (26536)5/25/1998 11:06:00 PM
From: Pruguy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Dec's revenue per employee is horrible , even compared to ibm and hwp. Anyone know what it stands to be after the layoffs for the new merged co.?