Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony Wong who wrote (2506)	5/29/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: M.J.D.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11568

Fwiw, I saw a report on Quicken.com Insider Trading today that John Sidgemore filed a 144 intent on May 1 to sell 340,000 shares of WCOM at $42.

To: Anthony Wong who wrote (2506)	5/31/1998 1:55:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11568

As I understand it, Mcic is selling off just its internet backbone business, and not its ISP retail business. The former has significant overlaps with Uunet/Wcom, the later does not. Because Worldcom has little ISP retail business (but a huge backbone business). This is not at all what GTE, Sprint and other competitors would like. But I also think it will be hard for the regulators to turn it down. The voice phone side of the merger is HUGELY pro-competitive. It's the first and only real competitive threat to the incumbent local Bell operating companies. The real advantage to adding MCI on the internet side is to add its name, consumer recognition, and its retail internet accounts. Since Wcom has relatively few retail internet accounts, it will be hard for the regulators to turn down the combination in this form. Even though they (and especially Wcom's worried competitors) would have far preferred to see Uunet divested. And, the Mci backbone assets divested can be relatively easily replaced. This is an argument that GTE is already making. But from a regulatory standpoint, so what? If Wcom can replace it, why can't competitors create their own? Doug