Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ICVI (now MTEI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maakamil who wrote (4656)	5/29/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: Turboe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11850

I am from Sullivan 20 miles from ISU...

To: Maakamil who wrote (4656)	5/29/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: justaninvestor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11850

Hi Maak - Good post. I didn't really buy MTEI for the WV coal or gas or even the high tech method of extracting the casing oil. The guy's right - it doesn't make them unique, but it also doesn't mean that they shouldn't do it. I think the big pop is in the future acquisitions and the merger with cash flow potential. Bottom line, if they build a bona fide company with cash flow in the near term, it's worth a heck of a lot more than 70 cents. bbruin

To: Maakamil who wrote (4656)	5/29/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11850

what makes them unique is their deep pockets. tell your buddy to wait until the end of next week and then ask the same question.

To: Maakamil who wrote (4656)	5/29/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: Howard C.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11850

I have to say this post seems knowledgeable and well thought out and is, therefore, lacking a refutation or other information, troubling...

To: Maakamil who wrote (4656)	5/29/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: Moonglow	Respond to of 11850

Maakamil, I didn't look upon your friend's note as necessarily being dissenting. It was a note telling about the generics that he has found to be true in the industry, and it was very informative. But his last paragraph basically stated that as far as ICVI goes, there aren't enough facts out yet to really base a reasonable judgment as to how well ICVI might or might not do. I think that's where the conversations and other findings that Rocketman and macker have done come into play. I think that they have been finding out things such as the "deep pockets", etc, that will eventually enable your friend to make a reasonable judgment once he gets more facts. And thanks for showing us the note. It was interesting! Juanita

To: Maakamil who wrote (4656)	5/29/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: BILL L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11850

HEADER: RE: Dissenting views Hello, Tim.P (lurker), could U respond to the dissenting message by Maakamil, written by this friend? In my mind, his friend is way too "generic" in making his conclusion. I wish he could argue point to point with ME press release, and come out with an answer why ME with 200M current asset and incoming acqusition only worth 70cents. Also, Maakamil, could u ask your friend (if he is willing) to get into a detailed analysis to above arguement. Bottom line, let the arguement go point to point. NO generic in drawing the conclusions. 1) IF he think ME CEO and others are just a bunch of old olimen, he needs to call, and tell us why he thinks so? 2) If he think ME property evalulated by independent firm is not reliable, present an argument why the group doing this evalualtion is not reliable (evidence) 3)If he think the fundamentals here is just for a quick run..ask him to present an arguement why the fundamentals is only for that? 4)Could he also provide an example where there are some successful coal and gas co. in West Virginia? and ask why they are successful? 5)The press release is generic, in a sense it is for general public. I bet these MEers will not have problems in answering his questions. The fact is that he did not talk to them, and make his conclusion. I believe his dissenting view is not backed by substance. It will be very useful to us, including dissenting views on ME, if these views are backed up by fact and evdience. This is very important DD. good for individuals to make their own judgement. Even people buying msft and dell have dissenting views..which we understand, as long as the views are backed by detailed substance and analysis Hope my analysis on the dissenting views help further arguements..and am waiting for that from your friends. Well, well..If U are worried about ME, SELL.and SELL. the price can only be supported by strong investors. If we are here for a quick run, we should have left last week, but we are still here..(this is FACT)