To: Rambi who wrote (22885 ) 6/13/1998 3:06:00 PM From: Grainne Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
Penni, I reread my post, and don't see it the same way you must have taken it. Of course, you were also responding to Ann's post, so I think things may have gotten generally muddled. I cannot speak for Ann, but will try to make myself clear. In my post, I am referring specifically to the Southern Baptist women who supported the change in the church policy about women. This would be the women who were on the steering committee which wrote the statement, the women at the convention who voted for it (it passed almost unanimously, as I recall), and/or went on television and defended it. I know that a lot of Southern Baptists do not go along with this kind of stuff. Bill Clinton and Al Gore are both Southern Baptists, and it is difficult to imagine Hillary and Tipper acquiescing. In fact, Mike McCurry, the president's press secretary, made a joke about how Bill would even tell Hillary that she was now expected to be submissive. If you reread my post, I didn't say anything at all about Southern women in general. I did write about what is appealing to women about the idea of being submissive, but I wrote that from my own perspective. I probably should have elaborated on my first paragraph, about never having been further south than Texas, because I can see where it might cause a misunderstanding. What I saw in Texas was a society where latinos and blacks were very, very submissive to white people, and this happened in all my interchanges with them. I also overheard openly racist remarks on several occasions. It was a strangely violent place to me, with rifles, shotguns and handguns everywhere, and people drinking beer while they drove. It was a culture shock, having lived so long in San Francisco. The society seems quite stratified according to race, although I know that is changing. My aunt wanted my husband and me to come and live in San Antonio, but I felt very strongly that this was a culture would be very difficult for me to feel at home in. As far as southern women, my grandmother was very independent and assertive and strong. Two of her daughters grew up loving to hunt and fish, were very athletic, and could skin a deer or spend hours wrestling a deep sea fish weighing several hundred pounds to death. Of course women all over the south are just as different as all the women anywhere, and I would not stereotype them. And I didn't!! I do think that what happened at the Southern Baptists convention is potentially very negative in its impact on society in general, because it sends dangerous messages to women and impressionable young girls. I am very concerned about the abuse of women and children, and anything that would tend to lead to more, not less, domination of women and children by men is going to arouse my interest, quite naturally. This was covered very, very widely in the press, and along with the Promise Keepers, is part of the conservative Christian political agenda which I find very alarming. So of course I am going to talk about it. This is a situation where a church is acting as an institution, and in a very political way, having an impact upon the larger society. Did you know that one quarter of teenage girls are battered in relationships in America? Right now, today? This is one of the statistics that was bandied about in one of the talking head discussions. Any widely publicized message, or reinforcement of a belief system, where women are expected to submit in any way is certainly a negative as it affects this wider societal problem. But later this afternoon, I am going to lie around outside in the garden with a tall glass of Southern Comfort on ice. I will garnish it with a mint sprig!! Who knows? Maybe I will even swoon or something!!! ;^)