Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: omegaman who wrote (13421)	6/16/1998 9:46:00 AM
From: Rob W	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Hi Rocketeer1, this is hadji calling from magic carpet on reconnasance. I got the impression that SI is looking suspiciously involved with the bashers. This is the best way to eliminate that possibility. Keep me posted and let me know how to verify myself. I have 9000 sh of infe and am currently tapped or would be buying more. I am avg at 3.9 The rocketeer goals of trying to level the playing field for small investors vs. the scum mm cheaters is like a dream come true. I started my investing with aapl back in december 97 and have been following the price for over 2 years and have always wondered why the stock price didn't follow fundementals. After reading the infe thread for a few weeks I felt a huge sense of hope for the little guys like me. Thanks again,

To: omegaman who wrote (13421)	6/16/1998 10:10:00 AM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (11) \| Respond to of 50264

Subject: Re: SI Suspension Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 08:50:04 -0500 From: SI Admin <si_admin@techstocks.com> To: bglenn@igateway.net References: 1 Thank you. I just removed your suspension. If they were calling companies pretending to be you, that would definitely be a "bad thing", to say the least. I can't do anything about that, of course. However, if someone pretends to be you on SI (it has happened before with others), let me know immediately. When that happens, there is no suspension. The account gets terminated and no new accounts can be made from that email address. I feel that one of the most important tenets of Silicon Investor is the protection of the privacy of the users, so I react quickly and harshly when I feel that's been violated. SI Admin (Bob) >This violation will NEVER be repeated But, remember the same one that >complained we talked to his father who said they were Joking when they called >companies impersonating the rocketeers using my name(no Joke) > >SI Admin wrote: > >> I'm getting email from folks saying that you don't know why you were >> suspended. >> >> Is that the case? >> >> I sent you a message earlier that you were suspended for violating another >> user's privacy. You maliciously (IMO) posted a link showing his personal >> info including address and phone number in 3 different threads. I still >> can't even figure out why you targeted him in that way. >>

To: omegaman who wrote (13421)	6/16/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: Scottoo	Respond to of 50264

Duh, duh and---------Duh!! WR, Scottoo

To: omegaman who wrote (13421)	6/16/1998 4:28:00 PM
From: DrVee	Read Replies (12) \| Respond to of 50264

FOOD FOR THOUGHT>>.>>>>>>>> A physician friend of mine asked me to post this message on his behalf since he hasn't signed up yet with SI to post.... What if this whole DGIV thing was a hoax all along.... in fact the biggest scam the Internet commerce has yet known? What if this stock was hyped by 3-4 insiders who stand to benefit a great deal from driving up the stock price? What if DGIV has no real plans to be listed on NASDAQ.. for obvious reasons? What if DGIV has no real contracts with any of the countries it names in its PR releases.... at least none that anyone has or can verify? What if DGIV doesn't have the technology that it claims to have.... or least none that anyone has actually seen? What if DGIV's revenues were generated primarily from selling plain old telephone equipment ? What if the news releases were engineered by DGIV's PR firm to hype the stock..... and that there is no real basis for any of that info? What if DGIV didn't make the $ 0.02 /share it claims to have made last year particularly since these aren't audited numbers? What if the FBI is now hot on the trail of these insiders who have been hyping this stock ? ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; That's pretty scary stuff ! If true then those of us who didn't cash out at $8.00 were suckers.......since the stock is now probably headed down to its level of 18cents/share. But then, we know that this can't be true.....................don't we? Dr. Vee