To: JDN who wrote (18673 ) 6/17/1998 7:35:00 PM From: Richard S. Schoenstadt Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
JDN, Having just worked out my own estimates on the revenue side, let me say that I think you are overestimating avg. billing rates. Here is how I figured avg. billing rates. I started with the base revenue in the 3rd quarter of 97. This was 5.88 million. I then used the employee figures in the 10K for the 4th qtr of 97 (figuring little change in that short time period). This showed the following. >>>From 10k --At June 30, 1997, the Company had 318 full-time employees. That number includes 179 engineers, designers, and project managers; 43 wiring, assembly, and fabrication workers; 30 sales persons; 24 service and other technicians and 42 administrative personnel, including its Executive Officers. <<<< I figured that 179 engineers etc. ; 43 wiring etc. workers; and the 24 service and other technicians generated the core revenue for the company. And I figured the engineers earned twice what the others did. (A guesstimate of course.) Adding everything up and dividing I figured that the avg. engineer brought in around 27,600 per quarter and the avg. tech worker 13,800. Now if you take your 1800 hours a year estimate, that's 450 per quarter, divide that into 27,600 you get only $61 dollars an hour. And this is for engineers. The avg. billing rate per all technical employee including the lesser skilled workers would be less. (5.88/246/450 = $53 an hour core business.) I then used these figures to guess how many workers were transferred to the year 2k work. If you look, the drop in core service revenues between qrt 3 97 and qtr 3 98 is just about a million bucks. So I figured that was roughly 40 (36 actually but I used the round number) engineers at 27,800. I also figured based on statements by the company that Tava had added roughly 20 new engineers - i.e. average contribution for the period - during the 3rd qtr. So this totaled roughly 60 engineers working on year 2k in qtr 3 - Jan 1 to March 31,98. Total year 2k service revenue was 2.23 million for that time period/60 engineers = 37,200 per engineer per qtr. Divide this by 450 hours per qtr. and you get $82.7 on avg. per engineer working on year 2k in the 3rd qtr. Since I believe Tava said they were raising rates for year 2k work in future qtrs I mulitiplied by 1.2 (purely a guess) which would equal about $99 per engineer. (This is a question that should be asked of Liolios. I.e. what is the avg. % increase in yr 2k rates for qtr 4 vs. qtr 3. Also what is ratio of year 2k vs. core. Also it would be nice to whether a labor component was involved with the database reports. If so how much. Assuming the total number of engineers was accurate that would increase avg. billing rate.) I didn't do any earnings calculations but my revenue calculation came out to 17.4 million in the 4th qtr and 25. million in the first quarter of 99 and 25.9 million in the second qtr. The small difference between the last two assumed the impact of hiring an additional fifty workers in July but no more beyond that. I used Nachates figures and others. Using that I used the April 30 figure of around 400 as the base on which Tava planned to add another 150 people. I figured 500 by the end of June and another 50 in July. Obviously if Tava continues to hire the revenue could be higher. I also assumed that the CD/database reports category will increase proportionally with yr 2k service revenues. I don't know if this is true or not - it would be nice to get some additional info from the company on this point. But based on this I estimated about 6.25 million in combined CD/database report revenue per quarter for 99. And I assumed core business to be constant. This includes core service, subcontracting and materials. I didn't include any licensing fees. Nor did I include any revenue from subcontracts on year 2k work - which seems to me a possibility. Since I have in the past always overestimated Tava's revenues, I wouldn't be surprised if I have done so again. Nonetheless we should see considerable improvement over the next 2 qtrs - at least. I guess I'll have to do some sort of rough earnings estimate next. RS