Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 246810 who wrote (1138)	7/3/1998 9:33:00 AM
From: cornbread	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

Comment on Patents: Text from the PTO web site: If, on examination of the application, or at a later stage during the reconsideration of the application, the patent application is found to be allowable, a notice of allowance will be sent to the applicant, or to applicant's attorney or agent of record, if any, and a fee for issuing the patent is due within three months from the date of the notice. In reading the AHEARNS letter posted on AENG home page, Notice of allowancewas issued in Dec. 1997. I spoke with the folks at the PTO office yesterday trying to find out the timing between the issuance of a Notice of allowance and a patent number. Being a typical Gov. agency the response was convoluted but from the folks I spoke with it sounded like 6 to 9 month is typical. Once the patent number are issued it will probably be 6 month before the PTO data base is updated to include these numbers. It is my opinion that patent numbers have not been issued yet, but the issuance of the number is only a matter of time.

To: 246810 who wrote (1138)	7/3/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: david travis	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 3383

Char, I don't understand how your logic works. Or maybe I understand perfectly how you operate. You make the statement Mr. Shelby has been given 1,000,000 shares. When asked your source you refer to a proven liar on this board. You cite the two posts as your source, how lame. You are very transparent. Now why wouldn't you question that source as to the details of the statement you are accepting as true. Why have you not once questioned this lying source of any of the false statements it has put up? Doesn't it seem strange that you take this cowards posts and regurgitate them as if they are true. As this derelict made the statement I suggest you go to the derelict and ask that what was said is substantiated. You will find it was a lie, but I think you already know that. Because someone says something doesn't make it true. In the case of this writer I have proven him to be a liar time and time again. So I look forward to seeing your post to the pathetic loser that posted this lie and ask him for his proof or source of information. If you are seeking the truth then go to the source of the statement and get the proof that the statement is worthy further discussion. As for myself I know of no such agreement to give Mr. Shelby 1,000,000 shares. Now lets see where you go with this. Do you seek the truth and expose the source when it can't back up what they represent? Or do you just start on something else and remain part of the choir? Wouldn't the same hold true for what ever is meant by the same liar's comment about a demo. I don't seem to see one question of some mother's embarrassment. Again I have never viewed any announcement by AENG about this whatever it is demo. A liar puts up a vague statement and you want the company to respond. Respond to what? Where is any substantiation behind your question. Where are the details? WHY HAVEN'T YOU QUESTIONED THE SOURCE OF THE FALSE INFORMATION THAT YOU WANT TO KNOW ABOUT? I believe you and I both know why. It only takes an ounce of integrity and an ounce of honesty to do what is right here. The obvious move would be to go to the source to see if there is any merit to look into. Again you show your colors when you just come out with a lie and make it a fact on your part. As for the patent, the AENG web page clearly points out the situation. As soon as the patent numbers are received they will be posted. You either accept it or you don't. I do. However, to make the statement that there is not one when you have no proof of that is a lie. And I can guarantee every lie put up will be held accounted for. "Just the facts mammmm." It is hard not to get personal with fake names that have a bent to lie. To put out false messages and never substantiate what they say. Then see a choir take those false statements and ask OTHERS to prove or disprove what was said. When you see something written the honest approach would be to ask the party making the statement to prove what they are saying. WHY HAVEN'T YOU DONE THAT ONCE SO FAR? I would like an answer to that question. I hope you have a wonderful weekend. Say hi to John for me.