SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ocom breakthrough technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (537)7/20/1998 6:30:00 AM
From: tonto  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 994
 
The WSJ article on the net did not speak well of stock genie. I wonder if those that follow the "stock genie" (would you trust investment advice from someone who called themself the stock genie?) also read the Wall Street Journal. Does anyone know for a fact that they were not compensated by OCOM?



To: Roger A. Babb who wrote (537)7/20/1998 9:24:00 AM
From: mod  Respond to of 994
 
<<Yes, I would say that OCOM is in the same class as CCSI. I am short both.... >>

That's not fair, Roger. They are two very different companies, though their recent stock performance may be similar.

CCSI has a product that works, but the market for their product may be small. (BTW, CCSI market cap is 2.5x OCOM at the moment.)

OCOM has a product that doesn't quite work yet, but there is a large market for a working version of their product.

Given the above, seems to me while there is little hope for CCSI, OCOM has potential IF they can fix the product soon.

Dennis