Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (18996)	7/23/1998 2:07:00 AM
From: Bill Purcell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

You have 1/2 a point. If it is ok for people to be positive "hype" it should also be ok for people to be negative "bash". However I don't believe I have ever seen a hypster who claims to have no financial interest in the stock and to be hyping the stock purely out of the goodness of his heart to try to help Joe Public make a little better return on his meager savings. Whereas that seems to be standard operating procedure for our friendly bashers. In my very humble and less than perfect opinion the playing field seems to be a tad unlevel these days. But then perhaps that is the way the market is supposed to work, eh? Rgrds, Bill Purcell

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (18996)	7/23/1998 8:35:00 AM
From: charles moore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

" To have fun at the lunacies and absolute lack of logic"?? I would like to know who appointed you the "Logic Police" and what makes you think you have better qualifications to judge than others? "Opinions are like a------s. Everyone has one and usually they all stink". Charles

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (18996)	7/23/1998 9:16:00 AM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

"The price of a stock goes up because there are more buyers than sellers..... the reverse is the result of more sellers than buyers." and "Remember that the FREE MARKET is the ultimate and final judge, and for you to suggest (and express), that a group of individuals have the force to "influence" the stock price" is at best naive." Oh, OK, so that is why DGIV's price went down when there were 2 and 3 times more buys than sells. OK, I get it. Sorry for being so naive. And sorry for the "dreaded italics." P.S. Como estas? Hace tiempo que no te vemos en estas partes.