Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : What-Are-My-Motives WAMM THREAD - HIDDEN AGENDA'S ON SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/25/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: makin_dough99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

Questions 1-4: My answers are no, no, no, no. Have a good day.

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/25/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

if 100 si members have not filled out a wamm form by the end of august, i will resign from SI and never post again Cav! Don't leave! Email from cOUSIN SHORTY: 1. NO WAY MAN1111!!!!!!! i GET WARRENTS!!!!! 2. i THOT THAT WAS illegal in canada, eh???? 3. Nope, UNEMPLODED RIGHT NOW, LOOking for wok 4. I dont EVEN POST UNDER MY own name AHA AHA AHAHHAHAH!!!!!! Add a 5th question: 5. Do you believe that Cavalry will really leave? BTW, you forgot to ask everyone what their motives actually are. And there is no apostrophe in "Agendas". Hope this helps, TLC

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/25/1998 6:18:00 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

Cavalry, WAMM QUESTIONAIRE: 1) ARE YOU A PAID STOCK PROMOTER ---------------1)no 2) DO YOU SELL SHORT OTC BULLETIN BOARD STOCKS--2)no 3) DO YOU WORK FOR SOMEONE WHO SHORTS OTC-BB'S--3)no 4) DO YOU POST ON SI UNDER MORE THAN ONE NAME---4)no I responded only because I'd feel guilty to know that you left SI because I didn't fill out your form. Of course you realize, don't you, that people are going to have to answer this form everytime they post, because things could change between when they answer the form questions and when they post again. KJC

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/25/1998 11:01:00 PM
From: Due Diligence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 407

Amazing how fast some of the "Thundering Herd" show up immediately in this SI exercise. Glad to see some stick basically to the four yes/no answers. Probably will never see many "yes's". Possible Lucky will, though. He is upfront about his short positions. Have no problem with that. Jimbo WAMM#9

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/26/1998 12:46:00 AM
From: Druss	Respond to of 407

Cavalry--In specific answers to your questions: 1 through 4 all are no, I would short BB stocks if I could. Your questions have a naive quality I fear. Under some conditions your questions if answered yes could result in a felony conviction for the respondent. Paid stock promoters can be convicted for not revealing the fact, particularly if they work for the company. This combined with #4 would just about make it a certainty. I will bet you the beer of our respective choice that you don't get one yes to #1. All the Best Druss

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/26/1998 8:30:00 AM
From: Needticker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 407

WAMM QUESTIONAIRE 1)ARE YOU A PAID STOCK PROMOTER --------------1)no 2)DO YOU SELL SHORT OTC BULLETIN BOARD STOCKS--2)no 3)DO YOU WORK FOR SOMEONE WHO SHORTS OTC-BB'S--3)no 4) DO YOU POST ON SI UNDER MORE THAN ONE NAME--4)no I have read a few of the posts here, and see that no matter where you go or what you try to do on SI, there are a few over bearing, obnoxious and obscene people. For them I say, try to get a life worthy of something. Of course, that is just my humble opinion. Jim

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/26/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: Jim Allgood	Respond to of 407

WAMM Questionaire: Answers to 1-4 No No No No I am here to learn about investing.

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/27/1998 4:39:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 407

No No No Yes - Jeff P.S. Well someone had to answer "yes" eventually.

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/27/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: Cigar	Respond to of 407

Cigar answer no, no, no, no. A thousand times no. Cigar appreciate Cavalry's attempt to tell chicken soup from chicken feathers, but believe if people type with forked fingers (which is not easy), they will continue to do so. Cigar advise all to have internal bulldoody indicator set to lowest possible threshold while reading all posts. Some posts good, some posts bulldoody. Cigar wish all good luck.

To: Cavalry who wrote (1)	7/27/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Hogger	Respond to of 407

Cav, 1 - No 2 - Certainly No 3 - Absolutely No 4 - Hades No I own stock in cygs ... am very much devoted to being very long with it ... generally detest 'shorters' ... hogger