Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DESERT DIRT TA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paunch who wrote (1338)	7/27/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: Greg Ronan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1539

I just called the BLM in Arizona.Thall is wrong,you do have a grace period of about 6 months..least thats what the person there told me. Greg

To: Paunch who wrote (1338)	7/27/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: knight	Respond to of 1539

Paunch, thanks for the clarification, much appreciated. eom

To: Paunch who wrote (1338)	7/27/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 1539

Paunch, thanks for the information. <<assay that works and the numbers are good>> Did he give you any idea of the assay numbers?

To: Paunch who wrote (1338)	7/28/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: mcmadden	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1539

Paunch I'm not sure what you mean by "support our company". Could you be more specific? If you mean support this current management,I'm finding that hard to do. Maybe if they would share with us what it is they are trying to do and be frank with us about where we really stand and how we got there. This wall of silence does not seem to be helping matters. If the company would just do something to encourage investors and instill some confidence in their leadership then investors might be able to trust them again. Untill that happens ,I think stockholders are going to pursue every possible means of recovering their investment. You talked to them Paunch , do they understand that or is it that their hands are tied right now and if that's the case how are we shareholders supposed to know that. As it stands people think that IPM officers are incompetent or crooks. It's hard to believe they can't say something.They could at least put something up on the web site. Sometimes I think they just don't believe it matters what we think. Which is why the share price is .01 or <. Which is why they can't get financing. Which is why the company is in chapter 11. Which is why they probably will be sued. Which is why IPM management may soon be out of work and never trusted again. Etc. Etc. Etc. It matters what we think !!! IPM Officers better find a way to address that and soon or they are going to be >>> out. Milt