Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (17849)	7/29/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: Catfish	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

jlallen, I hope Starr is not about to "win the battle but lose the war". Clinton testifying with counsel present is not good. The next thing we hear, counsel will be answering the questions for him, or advising him on how to answer during the process. Darrell

To: jlallen who wrote (17849)	7/29/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: lazarre	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

JLA, I'm getting awfully tired trying to help you understand what's really going on: <<<What is Starr thinking? He should have stuck to his guns and made Clinton testify without counsel in front of the grand jury.>>> It's not what the President says or does not say; its just the act of issuing the subpoena and forcing him to say something--for Starr, anything will do at this point; Clinton can read yesterday's baseball scores for all Starr cares. That is, and will be,Starr's only victory. Short term, a political one; mid term, that victory will ring hollow and long term it will have proved most dangerous. L