To: Suzanne Newsome who wrote (829 ) 8/2/1998 11:32:00 AM From: LegalBeast Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 5541
Oh my goodness, Ken Starr is reincarnate for sure. Disclose, disclose, disclose ... STOP THE WITCH_HUNT ... Change the title if you want. It is positive hype. The title says really nothing about what this company is going to do in the future. The dealings of Cannon with the SEC are negative hype, and that has nothing to do either with what this stock is going to do in the future. Look, if you really want to know what the whole story was back then get the case records. Just to humor you, I got on Westlaw and did a case search for Cannon and for GG, and came up with some interesting cases. They ranged from various people sueing because they thought their copyright on something or another had been infringed to them having been injured on the set of one of the films. And one very plain Jane Chapter 11 Bankrupcy. Nothing really out of the ordinary and nothing that seems to indicate the degree of negative hype being slung about here. What people on here, I think yourself included, are calling full disclosure is really trying to find something to use as a blame for the decline of the stock price. That is troublesome to me, Ken Starr, because in the name of full disclosure you are inferring facts that do not exist. As far as full disclosure goes, all of the court records are PUBLIC RECORD. They are not restricted from view by anyone. So, all you need do is visit your local law library or write the 9th circuit Bcy court or write the SEC, and under the FOI act, you may be provided complete copies of the case files which include all of the pleadings, transcripts of the proceedings, etc .... Go for it! All I ask is that you be real. What has happened between .37 and .12 is NOT because of what happened years ago, but what is happening now. Indeed, after these films now in production go into distribution, this stock price will increase. Then, it will likely desrease some as well. It is the nature of things.