SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nommedeguerre who wrote (10170)8/18/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
MS was not a consideration in choosing the 8088 over other processors.

If I remember correctly, IBM asked MicroSoft for a BASIC interpreter and an OS. Gates told them they couldn't do an OS and suggested Digital Research. Digital Research refused because of the various trade secret agreements they would have to sign and IBM went back to Gates who agreed to do it. MicroSoft then purchased the toy OS that they turned into PC-DOS 1.0 (another toy OS).

MicroSoft grew into today's Microsoft because Digital Research dropped the ball. Now Digital Research is suing Microsoft saying that Microsoft intentionally wrote Win95 and Win98 so that DR-DOS can't be used under the GUI.



To: nommedeguerre who wrote (10170)8/19/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: PMS Witch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
As I recall, the decision to use the 8088 was based on the 8088 using 8 bits externally and not requiring the development of a 16 bit motherboard. Quick and dirty. PW.