Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (18573)	8/28/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

You say: << Most men have violated a Woman's Rights...and claimed ignorance as a means to "write off" their guilt. It is precisely this guilt and self-loathing that men have PROJECTED onto Women...since the bible became the popular means of subjugation. Look, if I were you...I might have a hard time accepting the truth about nature, too. I might have a hard time not taking it personally. Some of my best friends are male...there's been no "write-off"... just a strong opinion that seems to offend men. They protest too much. It's the men who are in denial...look at the sex industry. men hate women then resent a Woman who does not accept, tolerate or encourage their urge to dominate, kill, rape and destroy Life on earth. Things are changing...thanks to Women being tenacious and resolved. >> Is this the kind of tenacity you are speaking of ? And do you agree with this sort of approach if you were in a similar situation ? (taken from an AP news wire today): A day after Clinton's address, the first lady said through a spokeswoman that she was "committed to her marriage and loves her husband."

To: lorrie coey who wrote (18573)	8/30/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I spoke with a good friend (female) about some of your ideas and she agreed with the essence of your position. I was surprised. Perhaps I will have to rethink, or rather think for the first time about your theories. I still feel that your tendency to communicate only in SUGs will result in very few converts, and if you really believe those SUGs, will tend to create a paranoid situation for you. If you expect every male you meet to conform to your preconceived characterization, you will never react to them, or they to you, as individuals. A couple of questions: Do you feel that Clinton is a positive, negative or neutral (neutered?) step in the evolution of the male of the species? Are you gay (sexually autonomous?)? G. W.