To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (23613 ) 8/31/1998 2:05:00 AM From: KLINVESTOR Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
I follow this Board and few of the other semi-equips regularily although I generally only post on Cohu's Board. What has surprised me over the past couple months is how little attention has been paid to the positive DRAM pricing action that has been occurring. Only a few comments have been made on the various Boards. Montgomery Securities posts a weekly DRAM and Microprocessor Pricing Update for their clients and for the last couple of months the pricing action has been extremely positive. As an example, this week (August 28) they point out that in the past six weeks 16 Mb PC-66 prices have risen 38% and 64Mb PC-66 prices are up 22%. While I recognize the Koreans have shut downs fabs for a week a month and Siemens closed a small UK Fab I am surprised that this strengthening DRAM market has not garnered more attention. Is that because pessimism is currently so pervasive that signs of good news are being overlooked? NT 5.0 is to be released mid-year 1999 and the majority of computer purchases are still corporate purchases and the recommended DRAM configuration for NT 5.0 is a minimum 128 MB. Since most corporate I.T. managers typically start incorporating configurations in their base system requirements for new PCs based upon anticipated application utilized it would seem like we would be looking at a further ramp-up in the base DRAM requirements over the next few couple of quarters. I keep reading postings about how much excess DRAM capacity there is and I am sure there is some truth but I can't believe that it is as large as most believe if DRAM prices have jumped as much as they have recently. The first half of 1998 was terrible for DRAM pricing for a variety of reasons including the need to work off excess PC inventories, excess DRAM inventories at manufacturers, continued acceleration in the Build to Order PC market thus reducing the inventorys maintained by PC makers, and of course the excess capacity that came on stream during 1997. It appears that the inventory issues have been worked out and now it is just a matter of time before the increasing demand catches up with the supply side. I am hopeful that we are a lot closer to that event than most believe based upon the what has occurred with recent DRAM pricing increases. Time will tell. Are there any others out there that put any significance in this DRAM pricing action? My focus on DRAM pricing is because this should be an early indicator of a turnaround in equipment orders. My other question relates to market prices variances between the large cap semi-equips and the small cap semi-equip stocks. While AMAT is a premier company and I am very bullish on the sector long-term I have a hard to rationalizing why to buy a large cap stock like AMAT which will be at a break-even earnings level soon while still trading at relatively high trailing PE,PSR, and PB ratios compared to other smaller cap stocks now. Cohu the largest domestic test handling company as example, and there are others, but Cohu trades at less than a 1 PSR ratio, at about 6 on a trailing PE, and something like 1.2 PB (No debt and Working Capital equals roughly 50-60% of market value). AMAT and some of the other large cap semi-equips trade at ratios of 2-3 times this. This is fairly typical of the market today since the Russell 2000 has done so poorly but it would seem that the sophisticated investors looking for opportunities in this sector right now would be focusing on the small stocks that have a strong position in their particular niche. Having said that, I really appreciate following the comments on the AMAT Board here because there is such a wide range of opinions and so much good information exchanged. Good luck to all.