Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mchip who wrote (23012)	9/4/1998 7:28:00 AM
From: Hardrocker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

mchip, I did not read anything in Karl's post which implies that every water meter needs to be reviewed. But is it not possible that embedded chips might need to be reviewed at water processing plants (controlling/monitoring pH, chlorine levels, etc.), pumping stations and so forth? From a layman's point of view, this would make sense. If there are truly 52,000 potential candidates out there, how do you define Karl's post as hype? I'm not baiting you -- just trying to get to fact and truth. Thanks in advance for your response, Hardrocker

To: mchip who wrote (23012)	9/4/1998 9:32:00 AM
From: Steve Sanchez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

mchip says: "Hype. Your water meter does not care what year it is, ..." one wonders then why the American Water Works Association (AWWA) has this guidance report: AWWA GUIDANCE ON THE YEAR 2000 (Y2K) PROBLEM awwa.org they also have these articles on y2k: 'Utilities Tackling Y2K Concerns' awwa.org and a whole forum on discussing y2k issues: awwa.org steve