SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yacht Trash who wrote (3285)9/8/1998 7:43:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 11568
 
'Risk Arbs' Stumble and May Yet Win Big (Repeat): Minding Money

Bloomberg News
September 8, 1998, 5:58 p.m. ET

'Risk Arbs' Stumble and May Yet Win Big (Repeat): Minding Money

(Repeats to fix typographical error in 8th paragraph.)

New York, Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Many money managers who buy
stock in companies about to merge lost money in August, but that
isn't dampening their enthusiasm that deals will make money for
them in coming months.

That's because the spreads between the prices of targets'
shares now, and the planned acquisition prices, widened in recent
weeks. ''This is as good as risk arbitrage gets,'' said Robert
Chapman, who runs Chapman Capital LLC in Los Angeles, which
invests in merger deals.

Last Monday, ''Arbitrage Week,'' a weekly tip sheet sent to
money management clients by Bear Stearns & Co., said spreads on
target companies were at their widest levels since the 1987 stock
market crash.

Take Daimler-Benz AG's pending purchase of Chrysler Corp.,
perhaps the most-favored transaction of arbitragers right now.
The spread between Chrysler's stock price and what shareholders
will get when the deal closes was about $4 a share at the end of
July. On Friday, it was $9.50. Capturing that spread could
translate into the equivalent of an annualized return of about 85
percent, managers calculate, assuming the transaction closes by
late November. That's up from about 30 percent a month ago.

Then there is Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a New York
buyout firm that said it would buy Centennial Cellular Corp. for
$43.50 a share, or $2 billion in cash and debt, on July 2. The
stock reached a high of 41 1/2 on July 16. Today it closed at 34
15/16.

Pushing Spreads Wider

The reasons weren't only that the Standard & Poor's 500
Index tumbled 18 percent between July 17 and last Friday. Some
busted transactions and turmoil in emerging markets also helped
to push the price of target companies lower.

Managers, for example, got spooked after Tellabs Inc.
renegotiated its purchase of Ciena Corp. at the end of August.
When the deal was first announced in June, the transaction was
valued at $65.88 a share. After Ciena lowered its third-quarter
earnings and said AT&T Corp. wouldn't be buying as much equipment
from them, Tellabs lowered its price by 20 percent.

That event followed Lockheed Martin Corp.'s scrapping of its
planned $10.7 billion purchase of Northrop Grumman Corp. on July
16 rather than fight a legal battle with federal antitrust
enforcers and the U.S. Defense Department.

Funds that combined investing in mergers with, say, emerging
market bonds also contributed to the decline of takeover stocks.
In order to meet margin calls on the money losers in developing
markets, some funds were forced to sell parts of their more
liquid holdings, including stocks they owned.

Damage to Funds

The damage to funds hasn't been tallied yet. Carrie McCabe,
head of Blackstone Alternative Asset Management, with about $1.3
billion invested with hedge funds, said the better risk arbitrage
managers were down between 3 percent and 6 percent in August.

Mikhail Kimbarovsky, president of Hedge Fund Research Inc.
in Chicago, which advises hedge fund investors and invests in
funds itself, said losses of ''arb'' funds it follows were
anywhere from 1 percent to 7 percent.

''If the market normalizes, spreads will come in,'' McCabe
said. ''We have managers requesting more capital.''

With the Dow Jones Industrial Average surging 5 percent
today, the spreads are already starting to narrow. Chrysler's and
Daimler's spread narrowed to $6.33.

Managers say the transactions they like best are the ones
that make strategic sense, like Chrysler and Daimler-Benz, and
therefore have little chance of falling through.

The Arbitrager's Strategy

Wolfgang Armbruster, managing director of Wyser-Pratte &
Co., says other deals that fit into that category are American
International Group's pending acquisition of SunAmerica Inc.,
Tyco International Ltd.'s purchase of U.S. Surgical Corp.,
British Petroleum Co.'s buyout of Amoco Corp. and Berkshire
Hathaway's purchase of General Re Corp.

Risk arbitragers try to profit from takeovers by buying
shares of the target company and selling short -- or borrowing
shares of the purchasing company and immediately selling them --
in the hopes they can be bought back at a cheaper price later.
Shares of the acquiring company usually fall leading up to the
completion of the acquisition.

The reason the Chrysler-Daimler deal went so out of whack is
that arbitragers were having difficulty borrowing shares of
Daimler, they said.

At Bear Stearns, the largest positions it holds include MCI
Communications Corp. and short WorldCom Inc., Chrysler and short
Daimler-Benz, Southern New England Telecommunications Corp. and
short SBC Communications Inc., and Tele-Communications Inc. and
short AT&T Corp.

The deals managers are staying away from are ones involving
junk-bond financing, such as the Centennial Cellular transaction,
since buyers will have difficulty in this market selling such
bonds.

''The risks in deals have always been there, but now they
are displayed in neon lights,'' said Chapman.

--Katherine Burton in the New York newsroom (212) 318-2335/cws



To: Yacht Trash who wrote (3285)9/8/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11568
 
Garry, I'm clueless as to why Sprint should trade higher than WCOM. Arb action, maybe? I expect WCOM to trade up after merger is finalized.



To: Yacht Trash who wrote (3285)9/8/1998 7:48:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 11568
 
CNBC's FABER REPORT: Is Vodafone Sizing Up Airtouch?
September 08, 1998 2:20 PM

The following report was aired on CNBC-TV by
CNBC reporter David Faber:

Shares of Airtouch Communications are having a nice
day today in part on old rumors that have resurfaced
due to an article in the London Observer. The article
claims that the UK's giant cellular provider, Vodafone,
held talks last year with Airtouch about buying that
company, which provides wireless service to about 14
million people in the U.S., Europe and Asia.

What I am hearing now, however, is that no talks are
taking place. And while Airtouch has long been thought
to be in the sites of a Vodafone, a Bell Atlantic or
perhaps a WorldCom, bankers and telecom execs who
know the company point out a few things that any
investor playing a deal here might want to keep in mind.
First off, while Vodafone officials could not be reached,
I am told by those who know the company well that it
does not want to buy all of Airtouch. In fact, it is
Airtouch's foreign properties that Vodafone wants, and
which many analysts point out would make the
combined company a powerhouse in Europe when
added to Vodafone's presence in the UK, France and
the Netherlands - the only real overlaps being in
Germany.

So could Airtouch effectively split up the company and
would it? That remains a key question. Aside from it
being far from clear whether CEO Sam Ginn would
consider such a move, there might also be another
impediment to such a split, namely taxes. It is not a
certainty that such a split could be done tax-free and
given Airtouch's low cost basis in Europe, it's unlikely to
be done at all.

As for price, while Airtouch declined all comment,
executives who have talked deal with Ginn in the past
tell me he might not be willing to accept an all-stock
deal, particularly stock from a high p/e company such as
Vodafone. And Vodafone, it should be noted, might
have a hard time coming up with a good deal of cash, if
in fact Ginn were to require that. And while Bell Atlantic
and WorldCom are still both thought of as potential
acquirers down the road, both currently have their plates
full: WorldCom with its just-about-closed deal to buy
MCI and Bell Atlantic with its far-from-closed deal to
buy GTE. As well, if Bell Atlantic were to come after
Airtouch after it closes the purchase of GTE, given that
company's cellular holdings, any deal to buy Airtouch's
domestic properties would require significant
divestitures.

Finally, there is the possibility that Vodafone teams up
with one of these companies to buy all of Airtouch. But
given those pending deals and the fact that Sam Ginn the
CEO believes his U.S. cellular properties are highly
undervalued, price could also get in the way.