SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7142)9/27/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: Big D  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
My Dearest Ann,

Your party affiliation is really immaterial to your lofty pontification as to women as life givers.

Frankly, I have never met a male who wishes to usurp you God given obligation or capability.

However,you know there has to be a however to your posting, the abortion issue would greatly assisted if you life givers would learn to keep your legs crossed when you find it "inappropriate" or doesn't fit into your schedule to become an "actived life giver"!

BTW, have you life givers tried doing it by yourselves? Artificial insemination doesn't qualify.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7142)9/27/1998 2:40:00 PM
From: Who, me?  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Good afternoon, Ann. Hope your day is going well.

Sorry to see that you did not respond to most of the comments in my post to you but then I really did not expect you to!!

Since I did not mention abortion in my post to you and abortion is almost the only thing you mentioned in your post, I can only assume that abortion is your main concern. We will just have to agree to disagree on this issue because neither of us will ever change the other's opinion. Since you choose to tell us why God made women the reproducer of children, why not quote Him directly. In Jeremiah 1:5, God says "before I formed you in your mother's womb, I knew you" so he is saying He opens and closes the womb to conception!

Those of us who do not doubt God's wisdom in this area, realize that He made women the birth givers because he trusted them to protect the human race at its most vulnerable beginnings.

No where does He say that women are more suitable to kill their own than men!

What you, and your fellow coalitionists need to learn, BOY,(another accurate word)

I am a woman, a mother and a grandmother! I know about giving birth and protecting them at their most vulnerable beginnings!

BTW, whether you care or not, I'm still a registered repub. because at one time the sensible, all-inclusive, intelligent members of the party(Pres. Reagan, Bob Dole)were in control; rather than the intolerant(sorry, but it's the most accurate definition), fervent fundamentalists represented by Jerry Falwell & Pat Robertson.

Ronald Reagan was unequivocally pro-life and vetoed numerous pieces of legislation because of abortion. Bob Dole has always voted pro-life! You wouldn't believe the number of Private Messages I've gotten regarding this statement of yours and of the two examples you used as agreeing with! And your statement of intolerance! Most think you're a hypocrite and a joke!

In order to avoid another seizure on your part, may I suggest you just skip over my posts from now on, as I usually do with yours. Sorry, if you consider me "mean";but then again I've never advertised myself as being christian as others have.

In closing, just let me say that your post to me makes me believe that you don't really suffer from insanity.......you enjoy every minute of it.


To this I will only respond with the greatest act of love and kindness I could ever express to you, I will pray for you!

Now, in response to all the blather you have spewed all over the Internet about me and others like me I will ask you again:

Who do you think got out and worked hard to help the Republicans win control of Congress in 1994? The liberals and moderates? NO, the conservatives!!!

Who do you think got out and worked hard to help Republican Governors win a majority of Governors' Mansions since Clinton took office? The liberals and moderates? NO, the conservatives!!!

Who do you think got out and worked hard to help Republicans take over a majority of the State House and Senate seats? The liberals and moderates? NO, the conservatives!!!

Why do you think Clinton moved to the right on legislation and policies and started showing up in church every Sunday carrying his Bible? To attract liberals and moderates? NO, the conservatives!!!

What is wrong with the Christian Coalition putting out their Voter Guides when all the liberal PACs do the same thing. You don't have to read the Christian Coalition's voter guides. You could choose to vote the opposite of the Christian Coalition with your ONE vote! The moment the AFL-CIO, Sierra Club, NEA, Teachers Union, etc. put out their list of endorsements, I know that most likely I'm going to vote the opposite way. THAT'S MY RIGHT! If the MAJORITY of the voters agree with me, guess what? MY CANDIDATE WINS!!! If the Republicans DO NOT want the Christian conservative vote, then win without us!!! We used to be CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS until the liberals took over. We can become conservative "something else" if you think you can get the Republicans to abandon us! Give it your best shot, girl! Meanwhile, how many elections did you win without us?


BTW, two of my best friends are atheist and they agree with me on MOST of my political positions! So it's not just "religious fanatics" that want this president gone. Also, one of the speakers that got the biggest applause at the Christian Coalition Convention was a Rabbi. I can't think of his name now but he's spoken to the Convention for the last 5 years. Not exactly a Christian, would you say? So to say only CHRISTIANS support the Christian Coalition is not accurate!



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7142)9/27/1998 6:21:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 13994
 
Ann, anyone who would allow partial birth abortion has never seen one.

Aborting a fetus at 9 months is murdering a human life. Any other explanation is simply rationalization.

I can understand a woman's right to have an abortion prior to say, 4 months. But if a baby can live outside the womb. No one has the right to kill it.

I wonder why we never saw this story on the nightly news?
legalactionforwomen.org

Michael