Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3DFX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tae Spam Kim who wrote (7723)	9/28/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Greg S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16960

For those that are interested, Gamasutra posted that they received an overwhelming number of responses to the 3Dfx article, so they put them up on line. Check them out at: gamasutra.com Note that everyone who liked the article said simply "good article" whereas most of the people that disagreed came up with a plethora of points why the writer had his head stuffed up his anal canal. -G

To: Tae Spam Kim who wrote (7723)	9/28/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16960

3Dfx vs. Nvidia Law Suit Please do pay attention. As I've been saying in numerous posts, the idea of multitexturing (or any other idea for that matter) is not pattentable. It makes no difference if you took risks to prove it as a viable idea. 3Dfx's claim is that Nvidia cloned the silicon circuitery that makes its multitexture unit. They have no holds on multitexturing in general or on the "method" which is in use in DxD. I verified this with the company on Friday. ST