Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alomex who wrote (18622)	9/28/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: X-Ray Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213182

Actually, the biggest advantage of a metal case is that it can act as a convection radiator for the heatsink of a Pentium! ;-) From a general use point of view, high impact plastic is probably more desirable.

To: Alomex who wrote (18622)	9/28/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Mark Palmberg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213182

How well does magnesium conduct heat? The last Portege I used almost cooked the palm on my left hand, and that had a plastic composite case. Now that they're using metal, maybe they should design the palm rest to look like a little griddle. Mark

To: Alomex who wrote (18622)	9/28/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: soup	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213182

Pick'em. Alomex; For the fun of it, I compared the Portege to a 2400c bundle we're selling at Tekserve: >Intel Mobile Pentium II Processor, 266 MHz or 300 MHz< 180 MHz 603e PPC. >12.1" TFT Active Matrix Display< 10.4" Active Matrix Display >32MB High Performance Synchronous DRAM, Expandable to 160MB.< Maxed out to 80MB! >Optional CD Network Dock< Built in. >K56flex Internal Modem (V.90 upgradeable)< Ditto -- via PC modem card. >1.1" Thin and 4.1 lbs.< Approx. 1.5" (Thick?) and 4.4 lbs. >Light Magnesium Casing with Silver-Metallic Upper Casing.< Black plastic stuff. >$2,999- $3,599< $1899 w/ external floppy, ClarisWorks and ClarisOrganizer and a Wetsuit 3.0 case. $2749 when upgraded with a blow-me-down NewerTech 240MHz G3/512K!

To: Alomex who wrote (18622)	9/28/1998 7:32:00 PM
From: Andrew Danielson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 213182

The AAPL-Files Reading all these posts, all I can say is that many of you are bordering on paranoid. I realize that a lot of you have mucho dinero devoted to AAPL stock or options. However, suddenly suggesting that analysts should be leading indicators for AAPL, not trailing, is rather humorous. Analysts currently predict a 48 cent profit. We think it is much higher. Does this sound familiar? It's called Q1, Q2, and Q3. What is more likely--that analysts go from being HORRIBLY wrong about a stock three quarters in a row to being perfectly right, or for them to get this quarter wrong as well (although probably not QUITE as wrong as before). They were off by 83.33% in Q1, 137.5% in Q2, and 52% in Q3. My .67 estimate for this quarter means a lessened 39% error--indicating a relative improvement over previous estimates. Analysts are notorious for being trailing indicators for stocks. An old Wall Street saying suggests that the moment all analysts recommend a stock, get the hell out. They are slow responding to a company who is staging a turnaround. And they are slow to downgrade earnings estimates for companies that are falling apart. Why? Up-turns and down-turns in a company mean wild fluctuations in earnings--and deviating sometimes significantly from the company's own forecasts. Why do analysts still forecast .48 for this quarter? Because they are listening to what Fred Anderson said months ago. He said to expect very modest Q-Q revenue growth in Q4. He also suggested indirectly that iMacs might lower margins. They also hear about the increased advertising costs and probably guess at slightly higher total costs. Put all this together, and you get earnings about the same as last quarter, which was .50--making their .48 seem suddenly reasonable. Most companies out there have matured to a sufficient degree that earnings are predictable enough for CFO's to lay out a pretty good picture of the future for analysts. Analysts are trained to listen to this information and value it over spotty "reports" coming in from various sources that may or may not be reliable. Unfortunately, they carry this tendency over to companies whose earnings picture is fluctuating too wildly for CFO's to predict a year or even a quarter ahead of time. Fred Anderson could not possibly have known three months ago that iMac demand would be so high or that its release would spur demand in the G3's and Powerbooks. Some industry analysts are in charge of researching a dozen or more stocks, leaving little time for any one individual company. They might have better sources of information, but I can PROMISE you that I spend more time analyzing, reading about, and tracking AAPL than any of its analysts. Meanwhile, look at Micron Electronics, who just reported today. Analysts predicted .02 earnings. The company came out with 17 cents. Wow. Andrew